Cancel the F-35

A petition to the United States Congress and the governments of Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Denmark, and Canada from the world and from the people of Burlington, Vermont, and Fairbanks, Alaska, where the F-35 is to be based. Initiated by Vermont Stop the F35 Coalition, Save Our Skies Vermont, Western Maine Matters, Alaska Peace Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks Peace Club, North Star Chapter 146 Veterans For Peace, World Beyond War,, Code Pink, Ben Cohen. Supported by: Centro Documentazione Manifesto Pacifista Internazionale, International Organization for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Nej tak til nye kampfly (in Denmark), Peaceful Skies Coalition (in Santa Fe, NM), Straits Area Concerned Citizens for Peace, Justice, and the Environment (in Michigan).

Please add your name below:

The F-35 is a weapon of offensive war, serving no defensive purpose. It is planned to cost the U.S. $1.4 trillion over 50 years. Because starvation on earth could be ended for $30 billion and the lack of clean drinking water for $11 billion per year, it is first and foremost through the wasting of resources that this airplane will kill. Military spending, contrary to popular misconception, also hurts the U.S. economy (see below) and other economies. The F-35 causes negative health impacts and cognitive impairment in children living near its bases. It renders housing near airports unsuitable for residential use. It has a high crash rate and horrible consequences to those living in the area of its crashes. Its emissions are a major environmental polluter.

Wars are endangering the United States and other participating nations rather than protecting them. Nonviolent tools of law, diplomacy, aid, crisis prevention, and verifiable nuclear disarmament should be substituted for continuing counterproductive wars. Therefore, we, the undersigned, call for the immediate cancellation of the F-35 program as a whole, and the immediate cancellation of plans to base any such dangerous and noisy jets near populated areas. We oppose replacing the F-35 with any other weapon or basing the F-35 in any other locations. We further demand redirection of the money for the F-35 back into taxpayers' pockets, and into environmental and human needs in the U.S., other F-35 customer nations, and around the world, including to fight climate change, pay off student debt, rebuild crumbling infrastructure, and improve education, healthcare, and housing.

51-75 of 34071 signatures
Number Date Name Location Please add comment.
34021 3 months ago Audra French Bellaire, TX , US
34020 3 months ago Anonymous S h, FL , US
34019 3 months ago Lynda Garner Delray Beach, FL , US
34018 3 months ago Sheldon Norberg Alameda, CA , US Is it possible the military could outdo itself in waste?
The F-35 program says - YES!
34017 3 months ago Carroll Nast Colfax, CA , US I am a veteran of the Vietnam War. Put the F35 money into the VA health care system to fully staff it.
34016 3 months ago Lois Zeidman Tempe, AZ , US
34015 4 months ago Clay Hansen Lafayette, CO , US
34014 4 months ago Alberta Householder St. Petersburg, FL , US
34013 4 months ago Anonymous Rindal, NO You people should really start doing some independent and real research, as i have found numerous misleading and false claims in this "article". I understand the relative ease of believing things li...
34012 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 is "A Turd With Wings".
34011 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 JSF is a huge waste of time, get rid of this piece of junk.
34010 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU Why do Israel Prefers Old F-15s to F-35s?
34009 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 Is Not Too Big to Fail. There Are Certainly Other Viable Options Do Exist.

Now is the right time to cut the losses and reinvest the money in some better-conceived air superiority ...
34008 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 Is Not Too Big to Fail. There Are Certainly Other Viable Options Do Exist.

It's the right time to cut the losses and reinvest the money in some better-conceived air superiority fi
2. To fill the far more serious long-term hole in close air support forces, complete the rewinging of the 100 A-10s the Air Force has refused to rewing and then expand the inadequate existing force of only 272 A-10s by refurbishing/rewinging to A-10C standards every available A-10 in the boneyard.

3. Immediately undertake three new competitive prototype flyoff programs to A) design and build a more lethal and more survivable close air support plane to replace the A-10; and B) design and build two different air superiority fighters (F-14/F-15 hybrid non-stealth conventional airframe design) far bigger and far more combat effective against competent enemies equipped with radar missile and stealth countermeasures, one to replace Air Force F-16s and F-22s and the other to replace Navy F/A-18s.

Stealth technology for future combat aircraft is a total delusional and must not be developed anymore. Stealth should never be here to stay.'); return false;">...
34007 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU New Details About the F-15X That Boeing is Pitching the US Air Force.

The “n...
34006 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU There is a New Details About the Proposed F-15X Derivative That Boeing is Pitching the US Air Force. The “new” jet is expected to be cheaper and carry more weapons than the F-35.

34005 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 and stealth technology will be useless inside heavily defended airspace when dealing with any sort of real military force. The F-35 is FAR less survivable against a very capable opponent. <...
34004 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The old and newest versions of the F-15 will easily outperform the F-35 in speed, manoeuvrability, high altitude ceiling, air-to-air, and air-to-ground. Add in the newest high-tech electronics, low-...
34003 4 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU In restricted wargames designed to make the F-35 look good maybe, in any actual air combat, the F-35 will be toast to an F-15. And a new F-15E is about $50 million while an F-35A is over $200 millio...
34002 4 months ago Michael Nilsson Buena Park, CA , US Way too expensive.
34001 4 months ago Joan Nicholson Kennett Square, PA , US
34000 4 months ago Joan Nicholson Kennett Square, PA , US
33999 4 months ago Nicole Gillespy Maple Shade, NJ , US
33998 4 months ago Anonymous Bay Shore, NY , US Fund health, education, clean energy, and all other pro- the people programs instead.
33997 4 months ago Timothy Casey Santa Rosa, CA , US It is time to end the U.S militarism, both as a threat to world peace and a profiteering racket for military contractors.
Next ->

By taking action you will be automatically signed up for action alerts from RootsAction. We consider your contact information to be private and confidential. We will NOT disclose it to any other entity unless you specifically authorize us to do so. You can unsubscribe at the bottom of any email you receive from us.

To endorse as an organization click here.

Why this matters:

The F-35 will kill and destroy while making us all less safe.
The F-35 is a first strike stealth weapon designed to penetrate air space undetected. It will be used for massive killing and destruction in more wars like Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Syria, and Vietnam in which millions of civilians have been killed and wounded and millions of refugees created. Despite the misery they caused, these wars did not make people in the United States safer, and they made things worse in each of the countries that U.S. warplanes and soldiers attacked. In fact, CIA director John Brennan told the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee on June 16, 2016, that the wars since 2001 have not worked: “… despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach.” In fact the war on terrorism has predictably and demonstrably increased rather than reduced terrorism. Gallup polling now finds that much of the world considers the United States the greatest threat to peace on earth. Nor is a fighter/bomber, like the F-35, capable of protecting anyone against nuclear ICBMs, cruise missiles, cyber attacks, global warming, or any individual acts of terrorism. The F-35 is designed for, among other things, delivery of the B61-12 nuclear weapon. Alaska's Congressional delegation has indicated several times that the F-35 is right for Alaska because of its proximity to Russia, making this weapon part of the new and perilous cold war.

The F-35 is a damaging trade-off.
1. Cost: The U.S. Air Force says the F-35 program will cost $1,400,000,000,000 over 50 years. The F-35 strips public money to pay private war contractors, like Lockheed Martin, that could better be spent to alleviate suffering, erase student debt, rebuild roads and bridges, defend against global warming, and provide education, health care, and housing. The money taken from such vital public use goes instead to war profiteers, increasing inequality and social division in the United States and elsewhere.

2. The F-35 destroys far more jobs than it creates: Researchers at the University of Massachusetts* report that each billion dollars spent on military preparations costs the United States between 4 and 16 thousand jobs as compared with tax cuts for working people or identical spending on clean energy, healthcare, or education. Thus, the $1.4 trillion, 50-year F-35 program means fewer jobs in the 45 U.S. states involved.

3. The F-35 causes cognitive impairment of children: The U.S. Air Force says the F-35A is more than four times louder than the intensely loud F-16 that it is replacing. A World Health Organization (WHO) report says that noise at the level of the F-35 on takeoff for just one minute is sufficient to cause health consequences: The WHO report states that children are more sensitive than adults, and the report cites data showing that the effects of such aircraft noise on children include cognitive impairment: adverse effects on reading, memory, auditory discrimination, speech perception, and academic performance, as well as other health effects, including increased blood pressure and increased stress hormones.*

4. The F-35 makes houses unsuitable for residential use: The Federal Aviation Administration says there is no effective mitigation for this noise besides families leaving. In Burlington Vermont, where F-16 jets are now based, the federal government paid to purchase and demolish 150 affordable homes to protect the people from damaging F-16 noise. The U.S. Air Force says that basing 18 F-35 jets at the airport in Burlington will cause 2,252 acres of land holding 2,963 households with 6,663 people to be in the “unsuitable for residential use” noise zone.

5. The F-35 has both a high crash risk and high crash consequences: The U.S. Air Force says all new military jets have a very high risk of crashing. The F-35 has far worse consequences when it crashes in or near people than older jets. Whereas older military jets were made of aluminum, the body of the F-35 is made of military composite materials with a stealth coating which emit highly toxic chemicals, particles, and fibers when set on fire during the inferno when thousands of gallons of jet fuel burst into flames. An Air Force report says this catastrophe should not be allowed to happen near people. The only way to prevent this tragedy from happening is to prevent basing of such military jets in or near densely populated areas, like Burlington Vermont or any of the other towns and cities planned for basing.